Thursday, 24 September 2015

Research: Institutions

MEDIA INSTITUTIONS IDENTIFICATION

Most artists are signed to a record label, which is the foundations of their contract. The contract includes information such as how many albums they have to release. Often, record label owners receive a fraction of profit generated by the artist. Record labels are branched off media institutions; conglomerates. These are companies who help produce and fund music videos for their signed artists. These institutions work in trade outside of the music industry too, like internet. 
_________________________________________________________________________

The benefits of working with a leading institution include:

  • Help (financial, promotional, etc)
  • Recognition
  • Diffusing of established audiences
  • Scope for collaborations with big artists
  • Reaching a global scale to be globally renowned
e.g. Michael Jackson as the 'King Of Pop'
_________________________________________________________________________
EMI

EMI, founded March 1931, is one of the worlds leading music companies. They own international institutions, such as Virgin - and their own record labels, like Angel, Blue Note and Capitol. Most artists funded by EMI are very niche and unheard of by the general public, such as:

Though EMI have many famous artists, like: 


  • Mariah Carey
  • Katy Perry
  • Rod Hot Chili Peppers
  • Omarion
  • Radiohead
  • Snoop Dogg
  • Spice Girls
  • Kylie Minogue



_________________________________________________________________________

Sony



Sony changed its name in 2008 from Sony BMG Music Entertainment to Sony Music Entertainment. They own record labels that cater to mainstream, international superstars. Like EMI, they offer a diversity of genres such as punk, R&B and pop.  Record labels include Arista Records, Colombia Records and J Records.

Famous artists within Sony:
  • Avril Lavigne
  • Britney Spears    
  • Beyonce
  • One Direction
  • Pitbull

_________________________________________________________________________



UMG


Being the worlds largest music content company, UMG are able to find and develop niche artists while maintaining their global success. They market and promote undiscovered music over a wide range of platforms to bring more success to 'alternative' genres.

Famous artists within UMG include:
  • Akon
  • Busta Rhymes
  • Nicki Minaj
  • Justin Bieber
  • Cheryl Cole
  • Adele
                             

_________________________________________________________________________


Warner

This institution does not reach the same global scale as the others, despite being internationally successful. Warner helps artists to achieve long-term creative and financial success by satisfying customers in the best ways possible. Unlike Sony, Warner keep artists for a long time which stabilizes their place in the small circle of success. Record labels include Atlantic, Asylum, Elektra and Warner Bros

Their artists feature:                                              
  • T.I.
  • Bruno Mars
  • Paramore
  • B.O.B

_________________________________________________________________________
DISADVANTAGES OF BEING SIGNED TO A RECORD LABEL:
  • If an artist stops selling for a while they could lose their contract
  • The contract may tell them to do things that aren't their style or interests
  • Most of the profits from album sales goes to the record label
  • This is why artists tour and converge

_________________________________________________________________________

I value raw talent more than reputation of the untalented. Generally speaking, mainstream music (particularly pop) owes it's massive audience to attractive faces and simple, catchy tunes. Therefore, if I had to pick which institution to sign with, I would pick Warner. They are known to build up the profiles of new styles of music, therefore bringing forth both talent and popularity. 

2 comments:

  1. Excellent research here into the leading four music institutions in the industry with some discussion on each.

    To improve;
    -so generally, what does each institution seem to look for in an artist? For example, EMI like to work with bands, and seem to work slightly alternative mainstream stars who are not always in the public eye.
    -can you provide some cons of being signed to an institution before you conclude as you comment on the benefits
    -is there anyone signed at Warner who you want your artist to be like? State this in your conclusion

    ReplyDelete
  2. Disadvantages added, but what do you mean by this? "This is why artists tour and converge"

    ReplyDelete